Managing White-tailed Deer in Suburban Environments - The Cornell University Study.Frequently Asked Questions about White-tailed Deer.Whitetail Deer Education Trunk Now Available Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) - Updated Information.In addition to the plan, deer managers produce annual reports on Maryland deer (both white-tailed and sika) populations and their management. The 2020 – 2034 Maryland Deer Management Plan provides the foundation for all deer management activities and decisions until 2034. Therefore, the Deer Project employs a blend of hunting-related deer management methods and proven non-lethal deer management techniques to manage deer.Ģ020-2034 Maryland White-tailed Deer Management Plan While hunting remains the most cost-effective and efficient population control mechanism available in most Maryland landscapes, continued urbanization has necessitated the development and use of non-lethal techniques where hunting is not practical or acceptable. and inform and educate Maryland citizens concerning deer biology, management options, and the impacts that deer have on landscapes and people.ĭuring the last couple of decades, the primary focus of the Deer Project has been to slow a rapidly growing deer population.encourage and promote the recreational use and enjoyment of the deer resource.maintain deer populations at levels necessary to ensure compatibility with human land uses and natural communities.to ensure the present and future well-being of deer and their habitat.The Deer Project utilizes broad-based deer management techniques to meet their diverse goals, which are: Addressing these knowledge gaps will assist the development and prioritisation of cost-effective management strategies and help increase stakeholder support for managing the impacts of deer on Australian ecosystems. The Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Deer Project is responsible for managing native white-tailed deer and exotic sika deer. We identified the following six priority research areas: (i) identifying long-term changes in plant communities caused by deer (ii) understanding interactions with other fauna (iii) measuring impacts on water quality (iv) assessing economic impacts on agriculture (including as disease vectors) (v) evaluating efficacy of management for mitigating deer impacts and (vi) quantifying changes in distribution and abundance. Furthermore, there has been little rigorous testing of the efficacy of deer management in Australia, and our understanding of the deer ecology required to guide deer management is limited. However, evidence of impacts in Australia is largely observational, and few studies have experimentally partitioned the impacts of deer from those of sympatric native and other introduced herbivores. The most significant impacts are likely to occur through direct effects of herbivory, with potentially cascading indirect effects on fauna and ecosystem processes. Deer could potentially occupy most of the continent, including parts of the arid interior. Most wild deer are in south-eastern Australia, but bioclimatic analysis suggested that four species are well suited to the tropical and subtropical climates of northern Australia. To clarify the knowledge base and identify research needs, we conducted a systematic review of the impacts and management of wild deer in Australia. Implementation of cost-effective management strategies that account for this complexity is hindered by a lack of knowledge of the nature, extent and severity of deer impacts. Approaches to managing wild deer in Australia are diverse and complex, with some populations managed as ‘game’ and others as ‘pests’.

Six species have established wild populations in Australia, and the distributions and abundances of some species are increasing. Deer are among the world’s most successful invasive mammals and can have substantial deleterious impacts on natural and agricultural ecosystems.

Deers project office